Twofish's Blog

December 18, 2006

Note on protectionism

Filed under: china, economics — twofish @ 5:57 pm

Note on Brad Setser’s blog:

[q]But the changes associated with China’s integration into the world economy have come about very rapidly — and are a bit at odds with the notion that China needs more time. Project ouy 30%y/y export and 15-20 y/y import growth for China now and you will quickly see what I mean. somethings do have to change — in real time, not historical time :)[/q]

I’m talking in terms of three to five years, not decades. What China really needs to do is to boost domestic consumption, and that requires a set of interlocking policies that will take three to five years to implement.

[q]I also strongly think you are underestimating the potential for protectionism — look at some of the polling data uber-free trader drezner has gathered, or the greenberg polling data on the 06 election. those swing voters who considered voting for the ds but stayed loyal to w often cited w’s approach to trade as a reason why they considered leaving the r camp. And it wasn’t b/c of W caved to pressure on steel in 03. [/q]

I live in the center of high-tech Texas. There are huge constituencies here against protection (i.e. pretty much everyone employed in the high-tech software or semiconductor industry). One problem with protectionism is that it isn’t a Republican versus Democrat issue. For there to be a real protectionist movement there has to be a third force (Perot or Buchanan) and right now I don’t see this happening.

Also the protectionists really don’t care about the RMB, because shifting the value of the RMB will just move things away from China to other areas. What the protectionists really want is to pull out of WTO, and I don’t see that as being very likely.

[q]It also isn’t just textiles. It is furniture and auto parts and indeed a growing range of industrial parts/ machines.[/q]

With respect to China it *is* just about textiles. In furniture or auto parts, China just doesn’t have a competitive advantage over places like Mexico. With textiles, China has loads of cheap labor, and a textile industry that stretchs back hundreds of years.

[q]But right now, ground zero is auto parts. Electronic production/ assembly hasn’t been done in the US for some time — not so for a lot of mechnanical engineering type products. And china’s capacities there are growing.[/q]

And with respect to auto parts, the question is China or Mexico. The electronic production/assembly example is why I don’t think that protectionism is that much of a worry. Once the entire industry goes offshore, then no one complains any more. Enough of the manufacturing base of the United States has moved offshore that I don’t think that there will be that much call to save jobs, because the jobs are already lost.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. China vs Mexico Trade is Good with Both
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    If you you to our website trugroup.com you will find a white paper on Arizona-Mexico competion and what TRU think Arizona manufacturers should do about it and the new competitive “threat” from China. Our answer is there is an advantage in the proximity of Mexico and by combining the strengths of the USA with the strengths of the USA we have a win-win situation. The same applies with the new China.

    TRU Group Inc – Activating Your StrategicMindset

    Comment by TRU group Inc - USA China Consultants — December 19, 2006 @ 1:47 am

  2. TRU works locally in China through our specialized contacts and we have bilingual consultants who are drawn upon to work in China on your project whether it is in business planning, market research, venture capital development, export-import, engineering or in manufacturing operations. Our consultants routinely visit China from North America and Europe. TRU has worked heavily internationally extending all its business consulting services to China and has a distinctive capability in technology intensive industry. china market research chinese venture capital in china plan feasibility due diligence study business plan manufacturing partner for product technology

    For North American Companies we can set you up for manufacturing in China with your own plant or in partnership or through contract manufacturing with existing factories. For new businesses we do feasibility studies and due diligence for example. We can also assist North American companies to export to and from China and resolve trade issues.

    TRU is able to assist Chinese Companies on a consulting basis to export to the United States and Europe, especially high technology materials, products, components and machinery. We can introduce customers for you and set you up for sales in these countries. We can provide you with highly qualified experts to resolve your technical, engineering and manufacturing issues in China. We assist you to find sources of materials, find partners and invest in the United States, Canada, Europe or other regions of the world.

    TRU Group Inc – Activating Your StrategicMindset

    Comment by TRU group Inc - USA China Consultants — December 19, 2006 @ 1:48 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: