Twofish’s Blog

May 12, 2008

Why bureaucracies win….

Filed under: china, politics — twofish @ 5:27 am

Being an “angry youth” at a demonstration is quite an experience.  You are full of youthful energy and idealism uncorrupted by real world experience.  You think you are going to change the world, and sometimes you just might.

The problem with passion and energy is that it quickly burns itself out.  After a month of demonstrations, you just want to get some sleep since changing the world is just plain exhausting.  At this point the bureaucracies start to win, because bureaucracies are slow, plodding, and boring, but they don’t get tired.  In a bureaucracy, you come in, you write reports, you file papers, and then you leave.  This is why bureaucracies are so effective.  They don’t get tired because they don’t get emotional.

To quote the fictional Star Trek character Khan Noonien Singh

“Improve a mechanical device and you may double productivity. But improve man, you gain a thousandfold.”

What Singh misses is that if you improve the relationships between people who can improve productivity a million-fold or destroy it all together.  There is a story about Lu Xun in which he was studying to be a doctor and then saw a film in which Japanese solidiers were executing Chinese, and then became a writer because what was the point in saving lives as a doctor if you could save thousands as a writer.  That sort of enters my thinking which is why I’ve ended up spending a great deal of time studying bureaucracies and being a bureaucrat myself.  The worst serial killers in the world can kill dozens of people by themselves, but put one in charge of a bureaucracy and tens of millions of people die.  But it works in reverse, a doctor can maybe save hundreds of lives, but an efficient healthcare bureaucracy can save tens of millions.

2 Comments »

  1. As I’m sure you know the trouble with bureaucracies is that many of those who join them are becoming co-opted and their individual agencies get slowly sucked out of them as they find themselves unable to bring about the changes they envisioned, in a setting in which the strong networks of the dominant majority uphold the comparatively safe status quo. So changing bureaucracies from within is quite a feat.

    Guess that may be another reason why Lu Xun chose to become a writer. He may have found even the thought of having to deal with ’slow, plodding, and boring’ bureaucratic mechanisms too exhausting.

    I guess both these career paths have the potential to change society from within, and I wished that less raw energy would get wasted in unreflective outbursts of anger.

    Comment by Peter — May 12, 2008 @ 11:27 am

  2. Hopped over from setser’s blog. Not to sound like the tired old cynic, but even youthful rebels become tired cynics given time and they are the ones who never gave in to the “dark forces”, so to speak. The labour government currently in power in Britain is the typical anti-establishment turned establishment and boy have they turned. Sad aint it that sooner or later , even if you’re successful in your rebellion, you inevitanbly turn into the establishment, wonder if Marx configured this in his theories.

    Comment by Judy Yeo — May 17, 2008 @ 12:56 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.